by Chaz Hinkle, contributor to
747SP.com
When the 747 entered revenue service
in early 1970, the people at Boeing had a big hit on their hands. Despite
its size,
the huge capacity aircraft brought seat/mile costs to new lows and opened up
international travel to those who previously couldn't afford it. Pan Am,
Northwest, TWA, and others were snatching up 747s as fast as they rolled off the line.
Douglas and Lockheed conceded the
upper end of the jumbo market to Boeing, but saw an opportunity to exploit a gap
in the Boeing product line between the 169-seat 707 and the 380-seat 747.
Their answers came in the form of the DC-10 and L1011. The medium-range
Douglas and Lockheed planes were well received by the airlines, and long haul
versions were on the drawing board.
Boeing realized it needed
to fill this gap quickly or risk losing that portion of the airliner market
entirely. Joe Sutter, Boeing's chief engineer, knew the quickest and
cheapest way to answer this need was to redesign one of the existing Boeing
models. Precedent in the airline industry had already been set for these
sorts of modifications. So called "stretch" versions of Boeing and Douglas
aircraft were already flying. But Sutter had a different approach: Instead
of a stretch, how about a "chop?"
|

Photo by
Jan Mogren |
His notion was to take the existing
747 design and shorten it, thus reducing its weight and optimizing it for both
transcontinental and international flight. Thus was born what was
originally called the 747SB (Short Body) concept. The biggest problem
Sutter and his crew faced was matching the fuel economy of the competition's
tri-jets. One of the ideas put forth was a three engine design, the notion
being that elimination of an engine would automatically lead to a 33% reduction
in fuel usage, as well as nearly seven tons of weight. This would place
one engine under each wing and one engine in the tail, much like the other
tri-jets. However, this proved to be too difficult an engineering
challenge, and would have required a time consuming and costly redesign of the
747 wing.
In the midst of this redesign
process, Pan Am announced it was looking for an aircraft to fly "long and thin"
routes that were too lengthy for the existing DC-10 and L1011, but for which a
standard 747 offered too much capacity. Douglas and Lockheed were already
working on long range variants of their wide bodies to fill this niche. It
was decided the best option for Boeing was to stick with the four-engine design
and seek improved fuel economy by saving weight in other areas of the plane.
By 1973, the model had been renamed
the 747SP (Special Performance) and was approved by the Boeing board in
September of that year. Within weeks, Pan Am placed an order for ten
aircraft, with options for another 15, with deliveries to begin in 1976.
The Pan Am deal was valued at $280 million and gave the SP project the steam it
needed to move full speed ahead. Boeing estimated that a market existed
for 214 aircraft, and the financial break-even point would be achieved with 45
aircraft.
The final design was approved, with
the SP being 48 feet and four inches shorter than a full size 747 (comparable in
length to today's 767-300), and carrying in the neighborhood of 280 passengers.
This resulted in an initial design weight reduction of 11,000 pounds, with
fuselage sections being removed from in front of and behind the wings, and a
redesigned center section.

Lighter materials were used in the wings, and single-slotted flaps replaced the
complex triple-slotted flaps of the 100/200 series. The under-wing
"canoes" which housed the flap mechanisms on full-size 747s were eliminated
entirely on the SP. In all, an empty SP weighed roughly 45,000 pounds less
than an empty 747-200.
|

Photo by
Chris Muir |
Other visible differences were ten
more feet of span in the horizontal stabilizer, a slightly taller vertical
stabilizer, a double hinged rudder, and a tapering of the upper fuselage into
the empenage. The redesigned center fuselage section also necessitated a
redesign of the wing fillets to improve airflow.

The first SP (msn
21022) was rolled out May 19, 1975, and made its
maiden flight less than two months later on July 4, ten days ahead of schedule.
Jack Waddell, who flew the first 747 test flight in 1969, also flew the maiden
SP flight, performing both a stall and a max speed (Mach 0.92) run on the three
hour first flight.
With a much lighter airframe, yet
with the same power as a full-size 747, the SP exceeded many of its design
estimates, and was proving to be a very strong performer. On November 12,
1975, Boeing decided to showcase that performance, and flew the fourth SP (msn
21025) non-stop from New York to Tokyo (a
distance of 6,927 miles) with 200 passengers on board in 13 hours, 33 minutes,
setting a new world record. After landing, the aircraft still had over
30,000 pounds of fuel remaining!
|

Photo by
Mick Bajcar |
The Boeing 747SP was granted a
supplemental type certificate on February 4, 1976. A month later, on March
5th, the record setting SP, now name "Clipper Freedom" (msn
21025), was delivered to Pan Am, with revenue
service commencing in April.
The SP continued to be an
exceptional performer, setting multiple distance and speed records.
However, despite its strong numbers, the shifting sands of airline economics had
quickly changed the landscape for the SP. This was due in part to
continued improvements in the 747-200B, airline deregulation in the U.S., and
escalating fuel prices worldwide. Although initially expressing interest
in 25 aircraft, financially troubled Pan Am ended up only taking their initial
order of ten (although they later added another SP, formerly ordered and owned
by Braniff).
Qantas, an early SP enthusiast, only took two. Boeing's SP order book
quickly slowed to a trickle, with most orders amounting to no more than a few aircraft. The final regular production SP (msn
22858) was delivered to the Iraqi Government on
August 30, 1982, and was the 44th SP produced. Five years later, Boeing
agreed to open up the SP production line to build one more SP for the United
Arab Emirates (msn 23610). That aircraft
first flew on March 31, 1987. With its 45th aircraft having been rolled
out, Boeing shut down the SP line for good.
|

Photo by
Gerard Helmer |
The first SP to be scrapped (msn
21025) found its way to the cutter's torch in
1997, but many of the former airline workhorses have found a new lease on life with
the ultra-rich. In the intervening years, the SP has become the aircraft
of choice for dignitaries, celebrities, and heads of state. The SP conveys
the unique look of the 747's strength and power, but without the size penalty
for the multi-billionaire who needs to find a parking space.
In the end, it's hard to know
whether Boeing made back its initial investment on the SP. But Boeing would claim the
SP program to be a success regardless, for no other reason than it provided a
springboard for many airlines to enter the wide body market. Indeed, the
SP broadly extended the reach of several airlines, including South African
Airways, China Airlines, and for a time, Iran Air.
To see where all the SPs have ended
up, visit our PRODUCTION LIST.
Sources:
Jenkins, Dennis R., Airliner Tech Series, Volume 6,
747-100/200/300/SP. Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 2000.
The Boeing Company, 747/747SP Reference Guide D6-60093.
Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, January, 1976.
This day in 747SP history:
Date |
Reg |
Airline |
Livery |
Name |
Event |
Airport |
Notes |
 |
| 1980 |
N606BN |
|
|
|
Other |
|
Boeing applies for, and is granted, the plane's first airworthiness certificate. |
| 2000 |
VH-EAB |
Qantas |
|
|
Incident |
|
Birdstrike on departure from SYD. Returned safely after having jettisoned off fuel over the coast.
Read more |
| 2005 |
A9C-HMH |
Bahrain |
|
|
Seen |
LHR |
Parked outside BMI hangar. |